Treatment decisions often follow formal or informal algorithmic guidelines. Treatment options can often be ranked or prioritized into lines of therapy: first-line therapy, second-line therapy, third-line therapy, and so on. First-line therapy (sometimes referred to as induction therapy, primary therapy, or front-line therapy)[11] is the first therapy that will be tried. Its priority over other options is usually either: (1) formally recommended on the basis of clinical trial evidence for its best-available combination of efficacy, safety, and tolerability or (2) chosen based on the clinical experience of the physician. If a first-line therapy either fails to resolve the issue or produces intolerable side effects, additional (second-line) therapies may be substituted or added to the treatment regimen, followed by third-line therapies, and so on.
An example of a context in which the formalization of treatment algorithms and the ranking of lines of therapy is very extensive is chemotherapy regimens. Because of the great difficulty in successfully treating some forms of cancer, one line after another may be tried. In oncology the count of therapy lines may reach 10 or even 20.
Often multiple therapies may be tried simultaneously (combination therapy or polytherapy). Thus combination chemotherapy is also called polychemotherapy, whereas chemotherapy with one agent at a time is called single-agent therapy or monotherapy. Single-agent therapy is a care algorithm that focuses on one specific drug or procedure. It utilizes a single therapeutic agent rather than combining multiple ones.[12] Multiagent Therapy is a treatment by two or more drugs or procedures. Comprehensive therapy combines various forms of medical treatment to provide the most effective care for patients.[13]
↑ Eskinazi, D., & Mindes, J. (2001). "代替医療:定義、範囲、課題". Asia-Pacific Biotech News , 5(01), 19-25.
↑ Buttorff, C., Heins, SE & Al-Ibrahim, H. 健康保険請求における緊急医療センターの識別に関する定義の比較。Health Serv Outcomes Res Method 21, 229–237 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-020-00224-6
↑ Hansoti, B., Aluisio, AR, Barry, MA, Davey, K., Lentz, BA, Modi, P., ... & Global Emergency Medicine Think Tank Clinical Research Working Group. (2017). Global health and emergency care: defining clinical research priorities. Academic Emergency Medicine, 24(6), 742–753.
↑ Friedlander, David F.; Krimphove, Marieke J.; Cole, Alexander P.; Marchese, Maya; Lipsitz, Stuart R.; Weissman, Joel S.; Schoenfeld, Andrew J.; Ortega, Gezzer; Trinh, Quoc-Dien (2021 年 5 月). "外来手術と入院手術のどちらに価値があるか?". Annals of Surgery . 273 (5): 909– 916. doi : 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003578 . PMID 31460878 .
↑ Cousins, Sian; Blencowe, Natalie S; Blazeby, Jane M (2019年7月) 「侵襲的処置とは何か?研究デザイン、エビデンス統合、研究追跡に役立つ定義」 BMJ Open 9 ( 7) e028576. doi : 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028576 . PMC 6678000 . PMID 31366651 .
↑ Klein, Eran (2023年9月) 「医療機器を侵襲的と呼ぶとはどういう意味か?」 . Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy . 26 (3): 325–334 . doi : 10.1007/s11019-023-10147-x . PMC 10425495 . PMID 37131099 .
↑デイビス、ニック J.ファン コーニングスブルッゲン、マルティン G. (2013)。」「非侵襲的」脳刺激は非侵襲的ではない」。Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience . 7:76 . doi : 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00076 . PMC 3870277. PMID 24391554 .