Other bases which are unbiased to both the standard basis and the basis generated by the Fourier matrix can be generated using Weyl groups.[11] The dimension of the Hilbert space is important when generating sets of mutually unbiased bases using Weyl groups. When d is a prime number, then the usual d+1 mutually unbiased bases can be generated using Weyl groups. When d is not a prime number, then it is possible that the maximal number of mutually unbiased bases which can be generated using this method is 3.
Then the eigenbases of the following d+1 operators are mutually unbiased:[22]
For odd d, the t-th eigenvector of the operator is given explicitly by[13]
When is a power of a prime, we make use of the finite field to construct a maximal set of d+1 mutually unbiased bases. We label the elements of the computational basis of Cd using the finite field: .
We define the operators and in the following way
where
is an additive character over the field and the addition and multiplication in the kets and is that of .
Then we form d+1 sets of commuting unitary operators:
and for each
The joint eigenbases of the operators in one set are mutually unbiased to that of any other set.[22] We thus have d+1 mutually unbiased bases.
Hadamard matrix method
Given that one basis in a Hilbert space is the standard basis, then all bases which are unbiased with respect to this basis can be represented by the columns of a complex Hadamard matrix multiplied by a normalization factor. For d=3 these matrices would have the form
The problem of finding a set of k+1 mutually unbiased bases therefore corresponds to finding k mutually unbiased complex Hadamard matrices.[11]
An example of a one parameter family of Hadamard matrices in a 4-dimensional Hilbert space is
↑ Schwinger, J. (1960). "Unitary Operator Bases, Harvard University" . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA . 46 (4): 570– 9. Bibcode : 1960PNAS...46..570S . doi : 10.1073/pnas.46.4.570 . PMC 222876 . PMID 16590645 .
↑ Ivanovic, ID (1981). "量子状態決定の幾何学的記述". J. Phys. A . 14 (12): 3241– 3245. Bibcode : 1981JPhA...14.3241I . doi : 10.1088/0305-4470/14/12/019 .
12Planat, M.; etal. (14 November 2006). "A Survey of Finite Algebraic Geometrical Structures Underlying Mutually Unbiased Quantum Measurements"(PDF). Foundations of Physics. 36 (11): 1662–1680. arXiv:quant-ph/0409081. Bibcode:2006FoPh...36.1662P. doi:10.1007/s10701-006-9079-3.
↑Wootters, W. K.; Fields, B. D. (1989). "Optimal State-Determination by Mutually Unbiased Measurements". Ann. Phys. 191 (2): 363–381. Bibcode:1989AnPhy.191..363W. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(89)90322-9. hdl:10338.dmlcz/141471.
↑Gottesman, D. (1996). "Class of quantum error-correcting codes saturating the quantum Hamming bound". Phys. Rev. A. 54 (3): 1862–1868. arXiv:quant-ph/9604038. Bibcode:1996PhRvA..54.1862G. doi:10.1103/physreva.54.1862. PMID9913672. S2CID16407184.
↑Calderbank, A. R.; etal. (1997). "Quantum Error Correction and Orthogonal Geometry". Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (3): 405–408. arXiv:quant-ph/9605005. Bibcode:1997PhRvL..78..405C. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.405. S2CID15326700.
↑Huang, Yichen (29 July 2010). "Entanglement criteria via concave-function uncertainty relations". Physical Review A. 82 (1) 012335. Bibcode:2010PhRvA..82a2335H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.82.012335.
↑Spengler, C.; Huber, M.; Brierley, S.; Adaktylos, T.; Hiesmayr, B. C. (2012). "Entanglement detection via mutually unbiased bases". Phys. Rev. A. 86 (2) 022311. arXiv:1202.5058. Bibcode:2012PhRvA..86b2311S. doi:10.1103/physreva.86.022311. S2CID34502667.
↑ Vaidman, L.; et al. (1987). 「そして「スピン1/2粒子の」。Phys . Rev. Lett . 58 (14): 1385–1387 . Bibcode : 1987PhRvL..58.1385V . doi : 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1385 . PMID 10034422 .
↑ Englert, B.-G.; Aharonov, Y. (2001). "The mean king's problem: prime degrees of freedom". Phys. Lett. A . 284 (1): 1– 5. arXiv : quant-ph/0101134 . Bibcode : 2001PhLA..284....1E . doi : 10.1016/s0375-9601(01)00271-7 . S2CID 14848100 .