税額控除とは、課税所得から差し引かれる金額であり、通常は追加収入を生み出すために発生した費用などに基づいて計算されます。税額控除は、免除や税額控除と同様に、税制上の優遇措置の一種です。控除、免除、税額控除の違いは、控除と免除はどちらも課税所得を減らすのに対し、税額控除は税金を減らすという点です。[ 1 ]
線の上と下は、調整総所得(2017 年課税年度の 1040 税務申告書の項目 37)より上または下の項目を指します。[ 2 ]線より上の税額控除は調整総所得を減らしますが、線より下の控除は、それらの控除の合計が標準控除額を超える場合にのみ課税所得を減らすことができます。たとえば、米国の 2018 年課税年度の標準控除額は、独身納税者の場合は 12,000 ドル、既婚者の場合は 24,000 ドルでした。[ 1 ] [ 3 ]
控除には、現在の利益を生み出す費用のみに認められるなど、条件が付く場合が多い。将来の利益を生み出す項目については、例外はあるものの、資本化が求められる場合がある。例えば、学生ローンの利息については控除が認められる。[ 1 ] 一部の制度では、影響力のある団体が購入を奨励したい項目について、納税者が控除を受けられるようになっている。
事業所得に課税するほぼすべての管轄区域では、事業経費の控除が認められています。控除額は地域によって異なり、包括的な場合と限定的な場合があります。控除を受けるためには、経費は事業の推進のために発生したものでなければならず、通常は営利目的で行われた活動のみが対象となります。
ほぼすべての所得税制度では、売上原価の控除が認められています。これは費用、総収入の減額[ 4 ]、または単に純利益の計算に使用される要素[ 5 ]とみなされる場合があります。 売上原価の決定方法には、さまざまな会計方法を含む、いくつかの固有の複雑さがあります。これらには以下が含まれます。
Many systems, including the United Kingdom, levy tax on all chargeable "profits of a trade" computed under local generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).[10] Under this approach, determination of whether an item is deductible depends upon accounting rules and judgments. By contrast, the U.S. allows as a deduction "all the ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business..."[11] subject to qualifications, enhancements, and limitations.[12] A similar approach is followed by Canada, but generally with fewer special rules. Such an approach poses significant definitional issues. Among the definitional issues often addressed are:
Note that under this concept, the same sorts of expenses are generally deductible by business entities and individuals carrying on a trade or business. To the extent such expenses relate to the employment of an individual and are not reimbursed by the employer, the amount may be deductible by the individual.[15]
Business deductions of flow-through entities may flow through as a component of the entity's net income in some jurisdictions. Deductions of flow-through entities may pass through to members of such entities separately from the net income of the entity in some jurisdictions or some cases. For example, charitable contributions by trusts, and all deductions of partnerships (and S corporations in the U.S.) are deductible by member beneficiaries or partners (or S corporation shareholders) in a manner appropriate to the deduction and the member, such as itemized deductions for charitable contributions or a component of net business profits for business expenses.[16]
One important aspect of determining tax deductions for business expenses is the timing of such deduction. The method used for this is commonly referred to as an accounting method. Accounting methods for tax purposes may differ from applicable GAAP. Examples include timing of recognition of cost recovery deductions (e.g., depreciation), current expensing of otherwise capitalizable costs of intangibles,[17] and rules related to costs that should be treated as part of cost of goods not yet sold.[18] Further, taxpayers often have choices among multiple accounting methods permissible under GAAP and/or tax rules. Examples include conventions for determining which goods have been sold (such as first-in-first-out, average cost, etc.), whether or not to defer minor expenses producing benefit in the immediately succeeding period, etc.
Accounting methods may be defined with some precision by tax law, as in the U.S. system, or may be based on GAAP, as in the UK system.
Many systems limit particular deductions, even where the expenses directly relate to the business. Such limitations may, by way of example, include:
In addition, deductions in excess of income in one endeavor may not be allowed to offset income from other endeavors. For example, the United States limits deductions related to passive activities to income from passive activities.[24]
In particular, expenses that are included in COGS cannot be deducted again as a business expense. COGS expenses include:
In 2005, the Australian government amended its taxation legislation to remove deductions for expenses incurred in conducting criminal business activities. This came after the Federal Court ruled in Commissioner of Taxation v La Rosa that a heroin dealer was entitled to a tax deduction for money stolen from him in a drug deal.[25]
Many systems require that the cost of items likely to produce future benefits be capitalized.[26] Examples include plant and equipment, fees related to acquisition, and developing intangible assets (e.g., patentable inventions). Such systems often allow a tax deduction for cost recovery in a future period.
A common approach to such cost recovery is to allow a deduction for a portion of the cost ratably over some period of years. The U.S. system refers to such a cost recovery deduction as depreciation for costs of tangible assets[27] and as amortization for costs of intangible assets. Depreciation in these systems is allowed over an estimated useful life, which may be assigned by the government for numerous classes of assets, based on the nature and use of the asset and the nature of the business.[28] The annual depreciation deduction may be computed on a straight line, declining balance, or other basis, as permitted in each country's rules.[29] Many systems allow amortization of the cost of intangible assets only on a straight-line basis, generally computed monthly over the actual expected life or a government specified life.[30]
Alternative approaches are used by some systems. Some systems allow a fixed percentage or dollar amount of cost recovery in particular years, often called "capital allowances".[31] This may be determined by reference to the type of asset or business.[32] Some systems allow specific charges for cost recovery for some assets upon certain identifiable events.[33]
Capitalization may be required for some items without the potential for cost recovery until disposition or abandonment of the asset to which the capitalized costs relate. This is often the case for costs related to the formation or reorganization of a corporation, or certain expenses in corporate acquisitions.[34] However, some systems provide for amortization of certain such costs, at the election of the taxpayer.[35]
Some systems distinguish between an active trade or business and the holding of assets to produce income.[36] In such systems, there may be additional limitations on the timing and nature of amounts that may be claimed as tax deductions. Many of the rules, including accounting methods and limits on deductions, that apply to business expenses also apply to income producing expenses.
Many systems allow a deduction for loss on sale, exchange, or abandonment of both business and non-business income producing assets. This deduction may be limited to gains from the same class of assets. In the U.S., a loss on non-business assets is considered a capital loss, and deduction of the loss is limited to capital gains. Also, in the U.S. a loss on the sale of the taxpayer's principal residence or other personal assets is not allowed as a deduction except to the extent due to casualty or theft.
Many jurisdictions allow certain classes of taxpayers to reduce taxable income for certain inherently personal items. A common such deduction is a fixed allowance for the taxpayer and certain family members or other persons supported by the taxpayer. The U.S. allows such a deduction for "personal exemptions" for the taxpayer and certain members of the taxpayer's household.[37] The UK grants a "personal allowance".[38] Both U.S. and UK allowances are phased out for individuals or married couples with income in excess of specified levels.
In addition, many jurisdictions allow reduction of taxable income for certain categories of expenses not incurred in connection with a business or investments. In the U.S. system, these (as well as certain business or investment expenses) are referred to as "itemized deductions" for individuals. The UK allows a few of these as personal reliefs. These include, for example, the following for U.S. residents (and UK residents as noted):
Many systems provide that an individual may claim a tax deduction for personal payments that, upon payment, become taxable to another person, such as alimony.[46] Such systems generally require, at a minimum, reporting of such amounts,[47] and may require that withholding tax be applied to the payment.[48]
一部の制度では、2つの会社または事業体が共通の支配下にある場合、他の会社または事業体の費用または損失を会社または事業体に対して控除することを認めています。このような控除は「グループ救済」と呼ばれることがあります。[ 49 ]一般的に、このような控除は、そのようなグループの税金の連結または結合計算(税務連結) の代わりに機能します。グループ救済は、EU加盟国の会社が他の国のグループ会社の損失に関して利用できる場合があります。 [ 50 ]
多くの制度では、外国の当事者、特に関連会社への支払いに係る税額控除に制限を設けています。国際税務および移転価格税制を参照してください。
オーストラリア: オーストラリア税務局:
カナダ:
イギリス:英国 歳入関税庁:
アメリカ合衆国: 内国歳入庁:
インド: